| |
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Ralph Hempel wrote:
>
> Well, I'd need to vibrate things while looking at raw values, which
> is possible, I guess.
I thought the problem was that it vibrated itself?
> I could run the gantry, smaple as long as
> possible and then store the value in an array...
<snip forth code, which looks cool :)>
>
> Then I'd just need to dump successive values (if only the darned
> tower wasn't narcoleptic...) and figure out if the transitions are smooth
Take a look at the code that Markus sent out a while ago with the new
firmdl he cooked up, particularly the code in keepalive.c and the code
that calls it. Though I haven't tested it, it looks like it should work
(I tried something like it earlier in the summer, but gave up because of
issues on the RCX, not the PC) and I think you should probably be able to
hammer it into something of use to you.
-Luis
#######################################################################
Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand.
-Anonymous
#######################################################################
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
