Subject:
|
Re: Syntax for reserving variables in NQC?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Sun, 28 May 2000 23:16:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2024 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Baum schreef:
>
> In article <3931A0AA.7AA6DEB1@3dgamers.com>, Jan-Albert van Ree
> <javanree@3dgamers.com> wrote:
> > It looks perfectly logical to me. Will it be possible to reserve a range
> > or
> > do we need to reserve each location separately?
> Handling a range should't be too tough - perhaps like this
>
> #pragma start [count]
>
> where count is assumed to be 1 if not present
>
> // reserve location 1
> #pragma 1
>
> // reserve locations 5,6 and 7
> #pragma 5 3
This looks a bit confusing, the alternative looks more logical to me.
> The alternative would be
>
> #pragma start [end]
>
> where end is assumed to be equal to start
>
> #pragma 1
> #pragma 5 7
Now this I can understand :-) Looks awesome.
--
Jan-Albert "Anvil" van Ree | http://www.nl.3dgamers.com
3D Sims Archive maintainer | http://www.3dgamers.com
Thrustmaster Resource Center | http://www.3dgamers.com/tmresourcecenter/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Syntax for reserving variables in NQC?
|
| (...) Handling a range should't be too tough - perhaps like this #pragma start [count] where count is assumed to be 1 if not present // reserve location 1 #pragma 1 // reserve locations 5,6 and 7 #pragma 5 3 --- The alternative would be #pragma (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
