Subject:
|
Re: Having trouble with -D option
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Feb 2000 05:11:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1997 times
|
| |
|
|
It works fine in 2.1, as promised.
Thanks Dave!
--
Mark Haye, haye (at) us (dot) ibm (dot) com
IBM TSM Server Development, Tucson, AZ
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote in message
news:dbaum-1DBD80.21230210022000@lugnet.com...
> You found a bug - NQC is actually defining D to be the tokens =1, which
> then leads to a lot of confusion later on. Basically I bungled the
> pointer math.
>
> I fixed the source so the next release (2.1 final) should be fine. I'll
> probably release 2.1 in the next week or so.
...
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Having trouble with -D option
|
| You found a bug - NQC is actually defining D to be the tokens =1, which then leads to a lot of confusion later on. Basically I bungled the pointer math. I fixed the source so the next release (2.1 final) should be fine. I'll probably release 2.1 in (...) (25 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
