Subject:
|
Re: Having trouble with -D option
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Feb 2000 05:29:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1895 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks for the quick response.
"It's fixed in the next release, which is due in a week or so"
qualifies for excellent support, IMHO. :)
My workaround is a REXX exec rewritting a small header
file on the fly before each compile.
--
Mark Haye, haye (at) us (dot) ibm (dot) com
IBM TSM Server Development, Tucson, AZ
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote in message
news:dbaum-1DBD80.21230210022000@lugnet.com...
> You found a bug - NQC is actually defining D to be the tokens =1, which
> then leads to a lot of confusion later on. Basically I bungled the
> pointer math.
>
> I fixed the source so the next release (2.1 final) should be fine. I'll
> probably release 2.1 in the next week or so.
>
> I don't think there's much of a work-around, but if you need a quick • ...
> reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Having trouble with -D option
|
| You found a bug - NQC is actually defining D to be the tokens =1, which then leads to a lot of confusion later on. Basically I bungled the pointer math. I fixed the source so the next release (2.1 final) should be fine. I'll probably release 2.1 in (...) (25 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
