 | | RIS 1.0 vs 1.5: which more "desirable"? —Jon Van Oast
|
| | | pardon my newbie-ness. i am researching mindstorms, as i am getting myself a set for xmas. now i am confused about the fact everyone seems to want RIS with the v 1.0 RCX. is this true? i guess i am just caught up in the details and new (to me) (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RIS 1.0 vs 1.5: which more "desirable"? —Robert G. Fay
|
| | | | | You will get a few extra parts with the 1.5 version, but the RCX does not have a place to plug in an AC Power adapter. NQC will work fine with both systems. Scout is junior to the Robotics System. Take a tour of the MindStorms sites and you will (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: RIS 1.0 vs 1.5: which more "desirable"? —Roger Hamlett
|
| | | | (...) The problem is that 1.5, does not have the vbx file to allow these to work. You have to get this from a version 1 system. (...) 1.5, adds quite a few useful pieces, but loses a few others. Having '1' upgraded, gives you the best of both (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RIS 1.0 vs 1.5: which more "desirable"? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) That's not true. Neither NQC nor LegOS require any vbx files. (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RIS 1.0 vs 1.5: which more "desirable"? —Roger Hamlett
|
| | | | (...) Sorry, should have said the command console, which does use the VB stuff, and also (of course), sending anything yourself from VB... (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
