|
|
 | | Re: NQC 2.4 beta test
|
| (...) Great! Thanks for all your hard work, Dave. - Rik. (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: NQC 2.4 beta test
|
| (...) Sorry, NQC doesn't have anything like that right now, but its a good idea. I'll make sure it gets added before 2.4 goes final. I like __NQC__ taking on a numeric value, and I'd want to leave room for more than 10 minor versions per major (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: NQC, what gives the fastest code ?
|
| Thanks Dave !! That was a very good explanation! In return a problem (and solution) with the serial data transmission (not an NQC error, but you could add it to your documentation). In doing fast data transfer from RCX to PC, there seems to be a (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | NQC for PocketPC (Win CE) Arm processor
|
| I just acquired a 64meg iPaq 3670 for use with Mindstorms and NQC but I haven't been able to find a ARM build of any of the software. Does anyone know of any or can they compile it? (URL) it for the SH3 and MIPS but not for the new generation of (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.palm, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: NQC 2.4 beta test
|
| Dave, does NQC have version specific #defines? I want to write some code that would compile differently depending on the version of NQC. Something like: #ifndef _NQC24_ ...or... #if (_NQC_ < 24) #include "bitShift.nqh" #endif #ifdef _NQC24_ ...or... (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
