Subject:
|
Re: NQC 2.4 beta test
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 May 2001 02:22:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2023 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <3AF99B56.9488D438@mail.com>, Rik Blok <RikBlok@mail.com>
wrote:
> Dave, does NQC have version specific #defines? I want to write some
> code that would compile differently depending on the version of NQC.
> Something like:
>
> #ifndef _NQC24_ ...or... #if (_NQC_ < 24)
> #include "bitShift.nqh"
> #endif
>
> #ifdef _NQC24_ ...or... #if (_NQC_ >= 24)
> x >>= 5;
> #else
> bitShiftRight(x,5,x);
> #endif
Sorry, NQC doesn't have anything like that right now, but its a good
idea. I'll make sure it gets added before 2.4 goes final.
I like __NQC__ taking on a numeric value, and I'd want to leave room for
more than 10 minor versions per major version, so eventually you could do
#if __NQC__ >= 204 // see if greater than 2.4
#endif
Dave
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NQC 2.4 beta test
|
| Dave, does NQC have version specific #defines? I want to write some code that would compile differently depending on the version of NQC. Something like: #ifndef _NQC24_ ...or... #if (_NQC_ < 24) #include "bitShift.nqh" #endif #ifdef _NQC24_ ...or... (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
