 | | NQC 2.4 beta test —Dave Baum
|
| | | NQC 2.4 a1 is in beta test, at the usual place: (URL) some of the constant value restrictions on some operators, added an option for merged source/assembly listings, added the ternary operator, added variable names back into code listings. Dave Baum (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: NQC 2.4 beta test —Rik Blok
|
| | | | Dave, does NQC have version specific #defines? I want to write some code that would compile differently depending on the version of NQC. Something like: #ifndef _NQC24_ ...or... #if (_NQC_ < 24) #include "bitShift.nqh" #endif #ifdef _NQC24_ ...or... (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NQC 2.4 beta test —Dave Baum
|
| | | | (...) Sorry, NQC doesn't have anything like that right now, but its a good idea. I'll make sure it gets added before 2.4 goes final. I like __NQC__ taking on a numeric value, and I'd want to leave room for more than 10 minor versions per major (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NQC 2.4 beta test —Rik Blok
|
| | | | (...) Great! Thanks for all your hard work, Dave. - Rik. (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
