 | | Re: New RcxCC revision posted
|
|
(...) Okay, another round of fixes/modifications. Sorry I'm making these changes so fast. I am *really* interested in hearing from anyone who is trying out my revised RcxCC, by the way. :-) Anyway, this version (available from the link above) (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Which way is faster?
|
|
By "fastest", I assume you mean the smallest worst case latency between a condition happening and the RCX responding to it. Option #2 has the drawback that while the RCX is responding to one condition, it won't be looking for the other ones. So the (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Which way is faster?
|
|
I want to know which way is faster: 1. Use three tasks to watch sensors task watch1() { while (true) { if () { .. } } } task watch2() { while (true) { if () { .. } } } task watch3() { while (true) { if () { .. } } } 2. Use one task with multi (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | New RcxCC revision posted
|
|
Anyone who is interested in trying my revised RcxCC can find a copy at: (URL) just uploaded another revision that implements several new features: 1) command line switches: /? or /help = display a help message on startup before continuing /COM=N = (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC for Mac OS X released
|
|
I'm sure there are tons of eager Mac users out there who want to start using OS X, but were afraid they'd have to give up Mindstorms. Well, the wait is over... I added a Mac OS X build of NQC to the releases at (URL) Baum (24 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
