|
| | Re: Visual NQC 2001
|
| (...) I've had similar results. I sent 5 or 6 bug reports to the author, but I suspect he may be a bit overwhelmed at the moment. I haven't heard a peep from him. (: Corey Snipes Boulder, CO, USA csnipes at qwest dot net (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | Re: Possible bug in firm0328 or NQC 2.2
|
| (...) You've got the args to OnFor() backwards. It should be OnFor(OUT_A + OUT_C, 30); If your original source had the args in the correct order, email it to me and I'll check the assembly listings to see what code is actually being generated. (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | Possible bug in firm0328 or NQC 2.2
|
| Yesterday evening I was testing some NQC code for an RCX with the new firm0328 installed. A very strange thing happened: motor B was running when motor A was expected to do. I double checked the connections, and the code, and couldn't really (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | Re: Visual NQC 2001
|
| (...) Oh, that probably means the web pages were written with Front Page which intentionally does stuff that only IE (usually only on a PC) can read. DLC (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | Re: Visual NQC 2001
|
| I have found this program to be rather nonfunctional. Anybody having any luck with it? -- Bob Fay California, USA rfay@we.mediaone.net (URL) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |