 | | Re: NQC tutorial available
|
|
(...) I think Mark is waiting for me to release NQC 1.3 - which is where SetWatch() gets added. In the meantime, you can define it yourself within your source code... #define SetWatch(h, m) asm { 0x22, (h), (m) } Dave (26 years ago, 31-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC tutorial available
|
|
Mark, In the section on "Display", you mention "Setwatch()" is available in V2.3. Any guess when this will be available? Thanks, -Phil (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC tutorial available
|
|
I have gone through most of the tutorial that posted by Mark Overmars which is extremely helpful. What a good job. Thanks Mark. There is one doubt and two question that I would like to get Mark or other people's attention. When I run the example (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC tutorial available
|
|
(...) Thanks Mark. I've been somewhat negligent on documentation myself. I've been very impressed with the dedication of the NQC user community. Originally, NQC was just a hack I threw together for my own use. At first I resisted releasing it (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC tutorial available
|
|
Excellent Job Mark. Thanks for all of your hard work. -Phil (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
