To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 981
980  |  982
Subject: 
RE: Religious wars
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Sat, 1 Apr 2000 22:50:24 GMT
Viewed: 
2043 times
  
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Ram Meenakshisundaram wrote:
XEmacs is great AND despite what everyone thinks, you DO NOT NEED X to run
it. It automatically knows whether to do terminal or X.

Right, and in terminal mode it does still have some advantages over
emacs. However, it loses the pulldown menus- which, for the newbie, are
the primary advantage.
-Luis

-----Original Message-----
From: news-gateway@lugnet.com
[mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
Of Luis Villa
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2000 3:16 PM
To: lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos@lugnet.com
Subject: Re: Religious wars


Not emacs? And not X based? Oof. That's a tough one.
My suggestions, in order. :
1) Fix your X configuration and run X and Xemacs. What card
do you run? I
may be able to help, or at least know where to point you.
And, Xemacs has
nice pull-down menus :)
2) Learn emacs- it's painful to learn, but once you've
figured it out, it
is great. Try going through the tutorial (Hit control-h, and
then a t, to
bring it up.) Once you are done with that, print out
refcard.ps (should
be in one of the emacs subdirectories) as a guide.
3) If neither of those two appeal, try searching
http://freshmeat.net for
text editors. There aren't many out there that aren't X-based, since
those people who prefer text-based almost universally use vi or emacs.
Good luck-
Luis

On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Rossz Vámos-Wentworth wrote:

Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 19:55:35 GMT
From: Rossz Vámos-Wentworth <rossw@jps.net>
To: lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos@lugnet.com
Subject: Religious wars

I need to pick a Linux editor for legOS programming.  emacs and vi suck • big
time.  Anyone have a recommendation?  It can not be X windows based as I
have not been able to get my video card configured correctly.  Under
Windows, I prefer using UltraEdit.

Rossz



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

  "As an engineer, it's important to look yourself in the eye in the
    mirror every morning, and remind yourself that 'marketing is
    everything,' and engineering doesn't matter a tinker's damn."
                          -Keith Bostic

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

  "As an engineer, it's important to look yourself in the eye in the
    mirror every morning, and remind yourself that 'marketing is
    everything,' and engineering doesn't matter a tinker's damn."
                          -Keith Bostic

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Message is in Reply To:
  RE: Religious wars
 
XEmacs is great AND despite what everyone thinks, you DO NOT NEED X to run it. It automatically knows whether to do terminal or X. Ram (...) (URL) for text editors. There aren't many out there that aren't X-based, since those people who prefer (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

6 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR