 | | Re: BrickOS Patches and Development
|
|
(...) Case in point: when I first started on this post some weeks(!) ago, hoenicke.ath.cx wasn't responding. (...) And it's not getting easier if we've collected different sets of patches and then make further changes based on those... So yeah, we (...) (16 years ago, 31-Mar-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | BrickOS Patches and Development
|
|
Greetings, This is a follow up to earlier postings discussing the development status of BrickOS. While the Sourceforge project has not had much activity of late, I've come across various modifications that, unfortunately, have never made it (...) (16 years ago, 15-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Development status
|
|
(...) I think we need to stick with 2.16.1, I don't know whether porting brickos to elf is really worth the trouble. Newer gcc versions would be nice, indeed, and brickos also builds fine with (some of?) these, but I never actually got it to run on (...) (16 years ago, 31-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Development status
|
|
Hi all, This is great to see there's still some interest. I may not have opportunity to post over the next couple days, but I have created some patches against the latest Sourceforge CVS (as I believe there are a few differences between the CVS and (...) (16 years ago, 30-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Development status
|
|
(...) From what I can tell, support for h8300-hitachi-hms(/coff) was dropped from binutils after 2.16.1. I have no real idea how much work it would take to port brickOS (plus brickemu, preferably) over to elf, but I suspect that it'd be a lot. (...) (16 years ago, 29-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Development status
|
|
Michael, Carl, (...) I'm encouraged by your efforts Carl and I don't have time to do the gcc work so Michael, I'd like to take you up on your offer. I do have two of the RCX bricks and a number of USB/IR towers and Linux machines. Carl, I've limited (...) (16 years ago, 27-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Development status
|
|
[...] (...) That's great news so far :-) Some time ago, however, I've tried to get brickOS to run on those old h8300 bricks, but it only seemed to work when using an old tool-chain (which is also the reason why the related packages never got (...) (16 years ago, 27-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Development status
|
|
(...) Hi Stephen, 2*Michael and others, I've (finally) started playing around with brickOS again. My RCX and almost all of my Lego is in storage a long long way from here, but that may actually be a good thing in this context. I've applied Jochen's (...) (16 years ago, 25-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Trains, Car and Level Crossing Automatic Control System
|
|
This system is used 4 RCXs to control 2 trains, 1 car and 1 level crossing. RCX1 is used to control 3 switch points and response 3 light sensors. RCX2 is used to control 3 segments track and response 2 light sensors. RCX3 is used to control level (...) (16 years ago, 6-Sep-08, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos) !
|
| |
| | Re: Problem to send long messages from RCX to PC via com Hack
|
|
(...) Dear Matthew I have found the problem. It was in kernel\lnp-locical.c -> cheking the echo was the problem solution: echo OFF it is a rough solution, but it works changes 1) rx_handler(void) ... // echos of own bytes -> collision detection // (...) (16 years ago, 29-Jun-08, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
