Subject:
|
Re: versions of gcc/binutils/newlib
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Nov 2002 02:11:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2857 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Gerhard Pfeiffer writes:
>
> Which versions of gcc/binutils and newlib is brickos developed with?
> As I read in here and tested myself, it doesn't work with the most recent
> versions (gcc 3.2, binutils 2.13 and newlib 1.10).
> Do I need a newlib? The howto doesn't mention it, but I didn't get a working
> gcc-compile without it. (and the cross-gcc-faq says, it should be used when
> makeing a cross-compiler).
GCC 2.95 versions and binutils 2.95 thru 2.10 appear to work.
I believe readers, here, have also successfully used gcc 3.0 and 3.1 but
not 3.2. The brickOS plan is to release brickOS-1.0.0 first. Then
we will work on adapting the code to work with gcc 3.2 and the latest
binutils The 1.1.0 release will be focused on this work.
re: newlib. If you are making a full cross compiler to build applications
for a system other than the one on which the compiler is running then
you need newlib. brickOS (and legOS) provide the pieces which newlib
provides so it is not needed in this case. I believe the gcc/binutils
builds are tied tightly enough to newlib that there are failures when
it is not present but these failures can be ignored. The resulting
cross compilation tool chain works despite them.
Regards,
Stephen - (i maintain the h8/300 gcc/binutils packages for Debian GNU/Linux)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | versions of gcc/binutils/newlib
|
| Hallo, Which versions of gcc/binutils and newlib is brickos developed with? As I read in here and tested myself, it doesn't work with the most recent versions (gcc 3.2, binutils 2.13 and newlib 1.10). Do I need a newlib? The howto doesn't mention (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
