 | | CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
I have verified that the following configuration works (but not without some minor modifications). I am hoping to submit and include the modifications in a future release of legOS (maybe 0.2.7). Apparently, the GNU Toolchain available from the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
(...) Am I understanding your diff? This version does not have the "hitachi" segment in the path? (...) And if I'm understanding this, this version of the tool chain does not support 'const'? If this is true, I'm not a fan of removing const from our (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
(...) What compile errors? Max. (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
Stephen, <snip> (...) Well, the only thing that it is complaining about (that I had to remove) is the use of const void func_decl(...) Really, I want to know what the difference is between: const void foo(void) --- and --- void foo(void) Does the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
"Max Bowsher" <maxb@ukf.net> wrote in message news:015701c1e790$f6...ibm.com... (...) folks or (...) on (...) Max, I received errors at various places with various versions (when compiling gcc and once with binutils). Most often, the build would (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
