| |
On Saturday 29 December 2001 19:40, Albert wrote:
> short: we can't find any compelling reason to hardcode the address. I'm
> not sure about Zhengrong, but I've modified my copy of LegOS to support
Do you have a patch?
> that would be messy. I found it cleaner to make an address-changing
> program that uses lnpd on the PC side, and adding an address-changing
I'm writing a compiler (automaton model of the robot to C). With dynamic
addresses, it could manage an "addresses pool", and simply add a call to
change the address when the program starts... On the other hand, if the
compiler knows the mapping automata <-> robots (with static addresses), it
could generate a makefile to download the programs to the right RCXs. ;)
Thanks for you answer.
Eric
--
email: eric.swalens@easynet.be
web: http://student.ulb.ac.be/~eswalens
icq: 2686881
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: host address
|
| Eric, see the thread started by Zhengrong Zhang on 11/5/01 about this. short: we can't find any compelling reason to hardcode the address. I'm not sure about Zhengrong, but I've modified my copy of LegOS to support "dynamic" addresses (i.e. can (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
