 | | Declarations in header files —Jakob Engblom
| | | | Hi! This is very technical, but: does the declaration of an "extern inline const void" function really make sense? GCC accepts it, but that is a VERY lenient compiler. An extern function should be definition not have a definition, and 'const void' (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Declarations in header files —Matthew Ahrens
| | | | | (...) "extern inline" means that we are defining an inline function, but if the inline function is not used, there is also an externally defined function with the same purpose. So, if you compile without optimization, it acts like "extern void (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | | |
