 | | Re: getpid?
|
| (...) [code snipped] Ah, I understand. You could still use my method, but you'd have to pass the pid in as a parameter to the functions that need to know it, which would be ugly. (...) Well, get hacking! ;) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: getpid?
|
| (...) The following patch will add both getpid() and getppid() to legOS: diff -u -r1.2 unistd.h --- include/unistd.h 2000/08/01 01:12:40 1.2 +++ include/unistd.h 2000/12/14 21:49:56 @@ -94,4 +94,7 @@ //! kill all processes with priority lower or (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: getpid?
|
| Eddie, Would there be any problem making these inline, seeing how they're one-liners? (I'm assuming here that the H8 target implements inline) Regards, ROSCO (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: getpid?
|
| (...) I wouldn't want to do so, not because the H8 does not implement inline, but because cpid is a local variable to tm.c (although it is not declared as such...). I think it's cleaner to have this user - kernel interface in real functions. Eddie (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
