| |
Eddie,
Would there be any problem making these inline, seeing how they're one-liners?
(I'm assuming here that the H8 target implements inline)
Regards,
ROSCO
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Eddie C. Dost writes:
>
> The following patch will add both getpid() and getppid() to legOS:
>
> diff -u -r1.2 unistd.h
> --- include/unistd.h 2000/08/01 01:12:40 1.2
> +++ include/unistd.h 2000/12/14 21:49:56
> @@ -94,4 +94,7 @@
> //! kill all processes with priority lower or equal than p, excluding self.
> extern void killall(priority_t p);
>
> +extern pid_t getpid(void);
> +extern pid_t getppid(void);
> +
> #endif // __unistd_h__
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: getpid?
|
| (...) I wouldn't want to do so, not because the H8 does not implement inline, but because cpid is a local variable to tm.c (although it is not declared as such...). I think it's cleaner to have this user - kernel interface in real functions. Eddie (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: getpid?
|
| (...) The following patch will add both getpid() and getppid() to legOS: diff -u -r1.2 unistd.h --- include/unistd.h 2000/08/01 01:12:40 1.2 +++ include/unistd.h 2000/12/14 21:49:56 @@ -94,4 +94,7 @@ //! kill all processes with priority lower or (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
