 | | Re: Rotation sensor bug found
|
| Lou, thank you for your reply. (...) This should work. (...) This seems wrong to me because sets all the STATE_n_VALUE to k-RANGE_SIZE. For now I modified ds_rotation_handler() in this way (two occurrences): // if ( IN_RANGE ( STATE_0_VALUE ) ) { // (...) (26 years ago, 18-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Rotation sensor bug found
|
| (...) It wouldn't, though. First it gets the maximum of the given value or RANGE_SIZE. That is done to prevent a similar overflow at the low end, even though, with current values, that won't happen. Then, that value is compared against the safe (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Rotation sensor bug found
|
| (...) OK. I was wrong. I should have better analyzed your code... This definitively prove how long still is my way to get my hands on C :) BTW, I wrote an e-mail to Markus but got it bounced back. Mario (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
