 | | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) (URL) > I doubt we need this very fast reading of sensors. This makes implementing (...) Yes, when we have user space timers... (...) This is correct, but there are many good reasons for keeping assembly low bandwidth, like pitfalls in (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) proof that this occurs (even though his logic does seem pretty dead on.) (...) Well, we do... time_t current_time = sys_time; while (sys_time < current_time + the amount of time I want to wait) { do nothing; } It's not pretty, but it is (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) This is why I want to measure things in our lab at work ;) (...) And keeps lower prio tasks from running, which they could do if we slept... (...) Oh well, there are some optimizations missing. I just looked at the code generated by (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) Right. I made the connection between Kekoa saying "I need to test" and you saying "I will test" right /after/ sending the message, of course :) (...) True. (...) I figured this would be the case. gcc is a wonderful tool, but it does tend to (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
