 | | Re: Possible bug with bss allocation —Paolo Masetti
|
| | | "Eddie C. Dost" <ecd@skynet.be> wrote in message news:200007222049.WA...set.net... (...) trivial, (...) In my opinion this is a great idea! :-) Please do the implementation! It also could be very usefull to have some docs / makefile options to make (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Possible bug with bss allocation —Luis Villa
|
| | | | (...) Paolo and others: Eddie and I have talked about this, and we both agree that this is a big change- so I think we are aiming for this for 0.2.5. Since it has already been seven months since 0.2.3, I think we'll aim for getting 0.2.4 out the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Ideas for 0.2.5 (was: Re: Possible bug with bss allocation) —Eddie C. Dost
|
| | | | (...) Shure, no problem. (...) While we are at it, I have two other major changes in mind: - Implement timers. A timer would install a callback function with a private to the caller void * argument. This callback function is called at the timers (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ideas for 0.2.5 (was: Re: Possible bug with bss allocation) —Luis Villa
|
| | | | This will be my last post for a few hours- I have real work to do :) (...) Generally, user programs have it pretty simple for this already (which is why I had thought of this some time ago, and then dismissed it.) I had never considered the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
