 | | Re: GA in RCX —Luis Villa
|
| | | (...) I've pondered it, though not actually done anything. The things to remember are that GAs need to do fitness testing, and the larger the population that you can do fitness tests on the better. On a big old PC, it's easy to do lots and lots of (...) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: GA in RCX —Tobias Bende
|
| | | | | (...) You will be. You will be... :) Tobias (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: GA in RCX —Ciaran Jessup
|
| | | | | | (...) I like that spirit :) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: GA in RCX —Pavel Petrovic
|
| | | | | (...) Yes. Therefore you might want to use the truncation selection, which allows you to have only 1 copy of the population at a time to save memory. It worked for us, we have a small GA running inside of the RCX. We evolved a program with simple (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: GA in RCX —Brandon Blodget
|
| | | | (...) I like the multiple robot idea. If each robot used a simulated annealing algorithm instead of a GA this would require less computation since it would be working on one chromosome instead of a population. Each robot could advertise its fitness (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
