 | | Re: lnp communication question —Luis Villa
|
| | | Remember the medium... cheap IR basically stinks for transmission. You get transients from the lights in your room, the outdoors, yadda, yadda. Luis (wishing for RF like the Europeans get ;) (...) ---...--- "Going to California with an aching in my (...) (25 years ago, 17-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: lnp communication question —Tobias Bende
|
| | | | (...) Ok, this brings up more questions :). I have never had any problems with errors when sending messages. Sometimes the message is not recieved but when it is, I have never seen any errors in the transmission. Am I missing your point? Second, (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: lnp communication question —Steven J. Morris
|
| | | | (...) lnp does a checksum and throws away bad data. I think it is a 1 byte checksum so 1 out of 256 errors gets through anyway. There is no retry so timeout and retry has to be handled by some higher level code. (25 years ago, 21-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
