 | | Re: Small problem compiling w/gcc-3.2 and binutils-2.12.0 with patch.
|
|
John, Good Job, John! It seems that older version of gcc don't catch the problem. I applied the changes and it compiles fine for me; I updated CVS. // Joe "John Jorgensen" <jjorgens@2gn.com> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.21.0...2gn.com... (...) (...) (22 years ago, 4-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Small problem compiling w/gcc-3.2 and binutils-2.12.0 with patch.
|
|
While compiling the brickos kernel under gcc-3.2 and binutils-2.12.0 I was getting errors about nb_tasks and nb_system_tasks not being te same as their declarations so I made them volatile just like in the header and the kernel now compiles. The (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Legos or Lejos
|
|
(...) If you already know some Java, I recommend Lejos. It has some very reliable classes for RCX to RCX communications using Java streams. It also has some useful debugging features. Good luck, Roger (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: binutils 2.12 is the last one to work
|
|
(...) yes, that's possible, but isn't the symbolsrec format a bit of a standard, indicating that the 2.12.1 version is just buggy? Also, it doesn't help with 2.13 since that one doesn't even get to produce any code. alejandro (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: binutils 2.12 is the last one to work Re: was compile error (was link error with binutils 2.13)
|
|
(...) You are right. I have the 2.12.1 rpm in my package folder and assumend that it is the one I use. But asking ld for it's version resulted in 2.12. One way ist to stay with 2.12, a second way is to change makelx so it could handle the (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
