 | | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
John A. Tamplin, Jason Clark, Jochen Hoenicke and Michael J Ash: Thank you all for addressing these issues! It all make sense after reading the preceeding messages. I appologize for causing confusion. I am glad, however, to get it straight. ??So (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | detecting memory leaks
|
|
In the thread "anyone know how to check free space on RCX?" the issue of checking for memory leaks was raised. I wanted to mention that I have some code that may help in that area. I wrote a function for the memory manager called mm_defrag() It (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
(...) The header is ok, but int is 2 bytes = 16 bit. You can check this with this highly optimized program: #include <conio.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { lcd_int( sizeof( int ) ); for(;;) ; return 0; } And in the kernel sources, mm.c says (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
(...) This can't be right. I'm about 99% sure that all of the ints I've used with my legOS programs have been 2 bytes. When using LNP to send RCX ints to a PC, for example, you have to use short on the PC end of things to make it all work right. (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
(...) My sources (gcc-3.0) say: #define INT_TYPE_SIZE (TARGET_INT32 ? 32 : 16) A short experiment revealed that sizeof(short)=sizeof(int)=2, sizeof(long)=4. So int is normally 16bit. Only with the switch "-mint32" I get 32 bit ints. This is with a (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
(...) According to config/h8300/h8300.h in the gcc sources, int is 32bit for the h8 cross compiler. I believe the reason mm_free_mem() returns an int is because the memory manager stores the size of each free block as size_t, which is defined in (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
(...) int is defined as the natural width of the processor, which on a 16-bit processor is 16 bits. longs are 64 bits on some machines as well, so you can't assume it is always 32 bits -- if your code cares, use sizeof. (...) 32-bit math on the H8 (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
That is very interesting Jason. It is interesting that mm_free_mem() returns a 16bit value using a 32bit return code. Both int and long are 32bit value on most computers/compilers these days; short would be a 16bit value; and char would be an 8bit (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
While the declaration for mm_free_mem is int mm_free_mem(void) The fact is that the RCX has only 32K of memory available. 32K in hex is 0x8000... there's never a need for more than 4 digits in hex. Looking at key_handler() in kernel/program.c (the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: HOWTO Demo.c
|
|
Brilliant! Brilliant! It works! Many Thanks to Micheal Obenland and also to Steve Hassenplug Best Regards Shehryar "Michael Obenland" <obenland@t-online.de> wrote in message news:Gz1xAM.Inn@lugnet.com... (...) some (...) ---...--- (...) ---...--- (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
Albert Huang, Sorry for the confusion. "most significant" = upper 16 bits and "least significant" = lower 16 bits (the free memory is a 32 bit value). If you write the values out, you will get the 32 bit value (both values are hex) ... for example: (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
(...) v0.2.6) When you press the View button (with no program running) LegOS will (...) Joseph, what do you mean by most significant / least significant? I'm under the impression that those two calls just display the same value, in decimal first and (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
Can someone please tell me how to unsubscribe from this group! Thanks, - Subir -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Ed Manlove Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:49 PM To: (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
Joseph, Not to add too much work load, if you have a chance could you give an overview of the proposals out there for the task scheduling and sensor modifications (if any). This could be simply a quick list of lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos threads which (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: HOWTO Demo.c
|
|
(...) Well, that's much easier than all the crap I was going through. I guess it helps if you actually know what you're talking about. Thanks Steve (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: HOWTO Demo.c
|
|
To solve your problems with demo.c, you sent me your source. There are some problems with it, but I think they are intresting enough to say something about them. The big problem you get with your program is caused by your main function: ---...--- (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | ***legOS new name : deadline is 18.07.***
|
|
As Steve mentioned, the 23.07. is too late for the announcement of the new name at Brickfest. I think it would be great to do so, so I decided to make the deadline at Thursday, 18.07. I will publish the new name around midnight of the 18.07 and (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | lnp error message..huh?
|
|
woolley thnx for the tip on checking the RCX memory.. now i have another question.. after having run continous messages back and forth between the RCX and my program on my PC for ~10 minutes. i get this error message: ---...--- Transmit error: (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
(...) I'd built a maze solver. When the solver makes a step (for example forward) it uses the light sensor to search for a wall and the rotation sensor to measure the distance it has traveled. If a wall is hit, the solver steps back until it reaches (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
"Joel Uddén" wrote (...) not (...) Actually, each task gets equal "wakeup" checking. The only difference between a low priority task and a high priority task is that the high priority task gets a larger time-slice when it is awake. This is not an (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
