 | | Re: about lnp_integrety_write
|
|
(...) Hi, the function does exactly what the name says...it sends a LNP integrity layer packet of given length. Anyway the function seems to be unused. lnp_addressing_write() is e.g. used to send the acknowledges in program.c, which makes perfect (...) (23 years ago, 3-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | about lnp_integrety_write
|
|
anyone know what this function does? i could get no reference to it under the legOS howto written by luis villa. ive tried sending messages both with it and without it and it seems to work anyways. regards kenneth johansen kennethj@stud.cs.uit.no (23 years ago, 3-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this an error in legOS 0.2.5?
|
|
(...) Hmmm, yes, you are right. In fact it woudn't make sense. My actual robot uses a little neural net and if battery goes low, the actual data will be sent to the PC to be saved. For this, it would be nice if the RCX makes some noise, I grab it, (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this an error in legOS 0.2.5?
|
|
(...) ultra-low (...) Would that really make sense? Since changing batteries destroys all memory, the program will not survive despite advance warning about the impending doom of battery low. In effect, changing the batteries is equivalent to the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this an error in legOS 0.2.5?
|
|
So in the original firmware, the system is shut down if ultra-low battery is detected. If we don't want tot do that, we could change the ">" in the 2nd compare to a "<" to get some hysteresis. Or would it be usefull to stop legOS and do a shut-down (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
