|
| | Re: EGCS and GCC
|
| Shouldn't. That's what my current set of tools was compiled with. When I referred (elsewhere?) to "changes with 2.95," I meant only that 2.95 has a different configuration syntax. Luis (...) ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | EGCS and GCC
|
| I am downloading the source for egcs 1.1.2 now. I was jsut wondering if it made any difference if I was compiling this, and binutils, with GCC 2.95. I know that there are errors in it, but I did not think that this will be a problem. Just thought (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | Re: missing posts
|
| I think lugnet had a burp. I just got a post I sent days ago, plus (I think) the other ones that you sent. Luis (...) ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish are jumping and the cotton is high... So hush, little baby, baby don't you (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | missing posts
|
| i posted the diffs for the remote 2 hours ago, but they haven't appeared yet... anyone know if lugnet has trouble with posts containing chars from diff? (like the less than and greater than symbols)... chris (24 years ago, 18-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | patch 1/3
|
| weird, i posted this an hour ago but nothing happened... i'll try posting in parts... patch util/dll-src/rcxtty.c 126c126 < dcb.Parity = 0; // 0-4=no,odd,even,mark,space --- (...) patch kernel/lnp-logical.c 212c212 < S_MR =SMR_P_NONE; --- (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |