|
|
 | | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
| Yannis- That's great! To be honest, I've never written a single line of code for Windows, so I can't be certain, but it looks very nicely organized and pretty straightforward in its interface. I'm sure someone will find a use for it, even if the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
| (...) that (...) Great job! But, please, give us a pre-compiled version of .dll too... VC++ is not a free compiler... ;-) I was working to a lnpd porting to Win32 (quite finished indeed), but I can stop if your version is already finished and (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
| Hello, I spent some time working on an ActiveX for LNP communication and I think that may be of interest for some of the users of this group. You can find the sources at (URL) send me all your comments. Thanks, Yannis (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
| Luis Villa <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message news:960488287.393fe...uke.edu... (...) productive, (...) Well, it depends of course on what you intend to do with it. If you for example design and implement a protocol of some sort, it's a great (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | two questions
|
| Hey, everybody. I have two questions, most of which probably can't be understood by most of the readers on this list :( 1) Is there any way that the stack size might be miscalculated by the new, improved makelx? I've experienced a problem where a (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
