Subject:
|
Re: P-brick Script code terminology
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 07:10:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3877 times
|
| |
|
|
Ah that explains it!
I didn't try RCX Code, I wasn't that keen on it and also it wouldn't run on my
NT workstation. I moved straight on to NQC and more recently have been trying
RoboLab.
That's why I didn't get the reference.
Thanks,
Conrad.
In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Ian Warfield writes:
> Conrad,
>
> LEGO does refer to series of commands as 'stacks'. This comes from the
> Robotics Invention System RCX Code interface where a program is a
> literal 'stack' of instruction blocks; those who haven't used RCX Code much
> wouldn't recognize the reference. I honestly don't know why they
> chose 'stack' either; it's caused many people confusion. Although I can't
> think of an appropriate alternative term to use in its place. Hmm.
>
> Ian Warfield
>
>
>
> In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Conrad Venn writes:
> > Perhaps someone can clarify this for me...
>
> > I've been looking at the LEGO P-brick Script code language documentation that
> > comes with the RIS 2.0 SDK PreAlpha.
>
> > I was initially confused by the numerous references to program stacks.
>
> > Does 'stack' here simply mean a series of program instructions? It seems that
> > it must.
>
> > It's just that in my limited (26 years) experience of programming, 'stack' • has
> > always meant a data structure and not code.
>
> [...]
> >
> > Conrad
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: P-brick Script code terminology
|
| Conrad, LEGO does refer to series of commands as 'stacks'. This comes from the Robotics Invention System RCX Code interface where a program is a literal 'stack' of instruction blocks; those who haven't used RCX Code much wouldn't recognize the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
