|
|
 | | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
| (...) IMHO, spirit.ocx doesn't provide OO capability - it does serve as an enabler, though. What it provides is the ability to write a VB program that writes an RCX program. This VB program can be as OO as you want it, but the calls to spirit.ocx (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: OO programing in RCX
|
| What I mean is to think the RCX in OO. For example, I can add a sensor object in my programming code when I plug a sensor into my RCX. I can make the sensor object to interface with the RCX object in the OO manner. Is that possible? I learned some (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
| (...) You are right, Matthew. It also supports the Mac and Unix, which RCX Code and the Spirit ActiveX control don't. David Leeper (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
| (...) Even if you don't know C, NQC is pretty easy to learn. (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
| Hi Tobias, If you're a computer programmer, I'd definitly suggest using something other than the RCX Code method of writing programs for the RCX. NQC is a nice environment if you know C. If you know a language that supports ActiveX, you can program (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
