Subject:
|
Re: RFC: Creation of Version 0.2.6
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:00:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2740 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Martin Scragg writes:
> In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Ross Crawford writes:
> > Well, even though it has a few Unix-ie functions, I don't really see it as a
> > -nix. My personal favourite is NogOS (for Marcus), but BrickOS is good, too.
>
> You could also try BricxOS (in a similar fashion to BricxCC), which also
> happens to have RCX in it.
>
> Martin
Excuse my ranting, but... Bricx-anything doesn't appeal to me (1); I'm not
fond of the "cx" pronounced at the end. Why not "Brick" or "Brix" instead?
BrixCC and BrixOS work, as do BrickCC and BrickOS.
Ian
(1) I dunno why; but it's a combination not used in English. The only
previous instance of this combination is the notable RCX, but that's an
abbreviation and technically not English (and as such it's touch-typed
differently). No words use the combination "cx"; in fact, some use the
reverse combination (e.g. "except"). Typing it just feels weird.
Hoping I don't start a flamewar... :-D
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
