 | | Web site up
|
|
All -- Finally overcame my HTML-blindness (mostly!) and got a web site up. Code and DATs for most of the robots. Hope you like them. (URL) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sending ir packets
|
|
(...) (URL) get you loads of info. Björn (24 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Sending ir packets
|
|
I am writing a program, and it doesnt work. Right now im just trying to make sure I can interface with the serial port properly. So I am sending: 55 ff 00 51 ae 03 fc 54 ab At 2400 baud, 8 data bits, odd parity, and one stop bit. It doesnt work. The (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Using two RCX bricks in one robot
|
|
As long as there is some surface for the IR to bounce off, the bricks do not have to face each other. Sending messages is the technique that is used and is very effective. You can do this with any of the various programming languages. -- Bob Fay (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Using two RCX bricks in one robot
|
|
I'm kicking around the idea of building a Mindstorm's based entry for the Trinity College Fire-Fighting Home Robot Contest (see (URL) ). I may be mistaken, but it seems impractical to attempt this task with a single brick... there just don't seem (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | MacNQC 3.0 Beta
|
|
Hi All, I've uploaded a beta version of MacNQC 3.0. New features are: * Added syntax coloring for NQC source code in the Editor Window. * Made the preference window multi-paned. It now has a Compiler Pane, a Communications Pane, an Editor Pane, and (...) (24 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | MacNQC 3.0a1 beta release
|
|
Hi All, I've uploaded a beta version of MacNQC. New features are: * Added syntax coloring for NQC source code in the Editor Window. * Made the preference window multi-paned. It now has a Compiler Pane, a Communications Pane, an Editor Pane, and a (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
|
The way I read the article it didn't seem that they were so much upset that he had come up with the new OS, but rather that he had named it legOS. No matter how you look at it, or what excuse he can come up for choosing that name, it is pushing the (...) (24 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
|
(...) I agree with you, Jürgen. It seems that we have to contend with taht viewpoint though. Hopefully if any of tyhe new product line doesn't do as well as expected, we will not see some genius in the company decide to go after people who add value (...) (24 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
