| | Re: Some goals, ideas, etc. for a new bytecode interpreter (long) Kekoa Proudfoot
| | | (...) Sure, but that's what zero padding is for. Since the opcode is IR-only, you don't care too much about length. The only length restriction comes from the second digit of the opcode, assuming you're using the ROM to receive incoming IR data. (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | | | | Re: Some goals, ideas, etc. for a new bytecode interpreter (long) Mark Tarrabain
| | | | | (...) Single-stepping through instructions would be a mode offered by the interpreter, and wouldn't require any breakpoints to be set. I suppose what the debugging information could contain is, instead of a list of valid breakpoints, a list of (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | | |