 | | Re: Help with latest pbForth firmware
|
|
(...) I've just uploaded a new version of a test build of BricxCC (as well as NQC) to (URL) I've just redone my tests again since you said 3.3.7.7 worked with the same version I tried earlier and now it is working with my current version. I don't (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with latest pbForth firmware
|
|
Hi John, Just to let you know that I have the same version of PbForth and it works fine with BricxCC version 3.3 (Build 3.3.7.7). Would you like me to try your new version here? Bye Mario (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RCX Sensor Port and Power Supply Circuits
|
|
Here are my drawings of the RCX sensor port and power supply circuits, complete with measured voltages from inside the box. These are averages measured with a DMM, not an indication of peak waveforms. I might use an oscilloscope later if there's a (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
| |
| | Help with latest pbForth firmware
|
|
I recently downloaded the latest pbForth files for Win32 from Ralph's site. I overwrote the previous version of the pbForth firmware file as well. Today, while I was trying to verify that my latest BricxCC changes haven't broken anything I tried (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Simulink Compilation
|
|
Dear BrickOS users We would like to start using Simulink + Realtime Workshop (Mathsoft)to compile and download code to the RCX. I have successfully completed the installtion procedure for BrickOS - but noticed that the setup code provided by (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: sub-vi begin vs end control
|
|
(...) Hi, This is a *minor* bug in RoboLab. The sub-vi diagram will have begin and end terminal labels swapped, but the program will function properly. Use the text tool to rename the terminal labels. Thought it should have been rectified in ver (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: sub-vi begin vs end control
|
|
(...) In a LabVIEW program (vi) there is a front panel and a block diagram. The front panel is the user interface and contains both controls and indicators. When you place a control/indicator on the front panel a corresponding terminal is created on (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: sub-vi begin vs end control
|
|
Hi Tom, Just for my education purpose, I'd like to understand the difference between the "begin" & "end" control boxes at the "Front Panel" window. Although they look identical, they must be different since they failed to wire to the blocks next to (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: sub-vi begin vs end control
|
|
(...) It is a leftover from LabVIEW. When you create a sub.vi, LabVIEW reuses the name of whatever is wired to the control/indicator. This behavior makes perfect sense in LabVIEW but much less so in Robolab. FWIW, the names are little more than (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | sub-vi begin vs end control
|
|
Hi, After a sub-vi is created, there are two controls created namely begin and end. Would someone explain why they are backwards? That means, it creates an "end" control linked to the beginning of the sub-vi, while the "begin" at the end. Thank in (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
