To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / *8465 (-5)
  Re: NQC's future
 
(...) Very! I don't expect to use the game data often, but it would be nice to have the option of having it available or not. thanks for the great work! (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
 
  Re: Further Adventures with Assembler
 
(...) Got it. I just converted my whole program from C++ to C, and then it stopped whining. (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: IR problems
 
(...) Thanks Ralph. I'll try this. I might have followed the wrong track but I got to this 'test program' trying to solve the problem I have in my 'real' program: I'm writing a PbForth version of the Trailerbot (Luis Villa, Extreme Mindstorms). The (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: Further Adventures with Assembler
 
(...) Yeah... that was me being stupid. The types are all correct in the program. I tried compiling without the .b and .w's, just to be sure and it's the same error. The arrays that cause the problem are of type const char. There's three that have (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: Further Adventures with Assembler
 
(...) The line above should produce an error because you are specifying a byte move into a word register. The fact that it doesn't always cause an error makes me think there's something flakey (in the assembler) in the way instruction operand sizes (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR