 | | Re: A very Power Tool
|
|
(...) For all of the virus creators and senders out there: if there's one thing worse than a witless script kiddie, it's a scum-sucking virus propagator. Send all of the viruses to me that you want. They'll just go to my 10GB bit-bucket. Loosers... (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | A very Power Tool
|
|
Do NOT OPEN THE ATTACHMENT!! It is a virus. It has been making the rounds, it is the KLEZ virus. Thought you all might want to know. Tim Burt (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: [ANN] pbForth Version 2.1.3 Release
|
|
Thanks, it seems to work much better now. Very quick turn-around time, I appreciate that. You've done an excellent job putting this Forth together, thank you for your efforts. David (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Oh, and I forgot one of the "BIGGEST" wishes on the list: 5) Linksys wireless access port response rather than the directional IR port. Or at least SOME form of 900MHz+ communication that is non-directional, with higher bandwidth (who knows...maybe (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Seems to me that the BEST implementation of the RCX would be for some CORE changes and feature sets to be built in. I realize that these would be somewhat expensive, but I would pay pretty good money to have an RCX with the following specs (built (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: egcs compiler - float problems?
|
|
(...) I have not tried to compile this, but one thing that looks suspicious is that you are using doubles. Doubles are not supported. The compiler I have (some old version of GCC) treats doubles and floats as the same type. The compiler you're using (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | [ANN] pbForth Version 2.1.3 Release
|
|
The new 2.1.3 Version of pbForth has only minor fixes thanks to the investigative efforts of David Rojas and Rob Harvey. They were able to provide detailed, reproducible bug reports, which makes fixing bugs so much easier. Thanks guys! Here's what (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | egcs compiler - float problems?
|
|
Can someone using the egcs compiler suite test the following code? It seems it doesn't compile under egcs. int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { double foo = 1.0; return foo > 0.1 ? 0 : 1; } Compiles fine under gcc 3.0.3. Regards, Michael (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | More problems with floats
|
|
When I try to compile a program containing the following function: bool tr_guard_foo_loc2_t0() { return getVarVal(&var_foo_cl) >= 0.1; } I get this error: /tmp/ccyEbqnS.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccyEbqnS.s:237: Error: cannot create floating-point (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: semaphores
|
|
Would it be possible for you to send the entire source? I would like to see how it interacts with the rest of the program. Thanks for your help. "kenneth johansen" <kennethj@stud.cs.uit.no> wrote in message news:3CDAC372.34D72C....uit.no... (...) (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
