To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / *5470 (-5)
  Re: COLOR light sensor
 
(...) VERY interesting! I was just talking with someone at the last SMART meeting how cool it would be if there was a colour light sensor. I can't wait to read more about it! Keep us informed how you do with it. I'm not exactly sure what a reading (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 
  Re: floating point operation
 
(...) I suspect that when you look at the assembler code produced by the compiler you will find in the first instance it was able to optimize the FP multiply out of the inner loop since it didn't depend on the loop induction variable. Ie, it simply (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: floating point operation
 
(...) I should clarify that this is true for the first version only. For some reason, the compiler does not optimize the second version in the same way. Anyways, what I see in the disassembly for the first version is a loop to 100 inside a loop to (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: floating point operation
 
(...) Compiler optimization? At least, a disassembly of similar code showed me that that seemed to be the case. The compiler can see that t is not used. Try returning t, or copying t to a global before you return from main. That will make things (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: COLOR light sensor
 
(...) Kick-ass idea! :) Plain or peanut? -Kekoa (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)  


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR