| | Re: RFC compliant TCP/IP and /or a new Version of LNP
|
|
(...) There was a while back, but I haven't heard anything for a while. (...) You might try one of the embedded versions of Linux. ROSCO (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Good news (Bad Rcx of ir transmitter)
|
|
(...) Dan, my experience with an RCX1.5 is that the IR tower and RCX communicate unnerringly at a distance of (say) 20 cm under low light conditions. Also, the remote control accessory unit will start and stop programs at a distance of 6 meters (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
|
| | RFC compliant TCP/IP and /or a new Version of LNP
|
|
Hi, is there someone who is currently working on a real (RFC-compliant) TCP/IP implementation for legOS to make the lnp obsolete ? Does anybody know where to find an extremely small TCP/IP implementation that could be ported to legOS ? PS: When will (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: lnp rcx hostaddress
|
|
(...) Hi, could you please post the code ? Thanks Cu, Olaf "Dammit Jim, I'm a programmer not a brain surgeon!" (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Good news (Bad Rcx of ir transmitter)
|
|
DH> I believe that that may DH> be because of background light, has anyone ever experienced this problem? Hi, this is indeed a possible cause of errors... have you tried putting tower and RCX under a box and then trying to transmit? (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|