|
|
 | | Re: c++, classes
|
| Hallo Frank, yes, it helped, thanks. But I still don't understand the background. Normally, in c++ you can initialize your private components in the body of the constructor or with a initialization list, like in your suggestion. Reagards. Michael (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| John, Yes please mail me your source code so I can add scout support to my program. In the beta version I added syntax highlighting the same way as in RCXCC only programmed in VB. The final version uses a complete new editor with support everything (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Serial talking between RCX and pc
|
| Hi! Does anyone know how to make a pc and a RCX talk to each other? I've seen some examples of basic communication like downloading programs or 'turn on motor A'. But I've not seen a protocol, i.e. sending down data that is to be processed by the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) Yeah, that went away as soon as I started using the RCX 2.0 locals for variable allocation - the symbolic information just didn't survive the rework. And I completely forgot to put it back in. I'm working on enhancing the listing a bit. I'll (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC, Join Forces !
|
| (...) That's a very good idea, JOIN FORCES (1+1>2) , divide the work and release your source codes, and make RCXcc alomost as popular as LINUX. Maybe sometimes in the future, when I've more time available, I'll join you. (...) Stef Mientki (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
