|
|
 | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5
|
| Don't punish yourself! At least you rendered the symbols from the gear correctly. There are at least four errors in the message I was responding to: (1) confusing the prefix n for nano with the unit symbol N for newton; (2) attaching two prefixes (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) You can probably use NQC to implement a lot of the other fancy features as well. The "-raw" option for NQC lets you send raw byte packets. You'd need to figure out the actual bytecodes from Lego's LASM document, but you wouldn't have to worry (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Can you test it for me?
|
| I made a lx file, but I can't test it, could you help me? (URL) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) This is unclear. What I mean to say is that I'm revising RcxCC so that it will be able to run in the situation where you do not have the Spirit OCX installed on your system. Since NQC is all that is required to compile, download, and run a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Revisions to RcxCC
|
| I'm working on a revision to Mark Overmars' fantastic RcxCC program. I'm an experienced Delphi programmer so that's no problem. But I'm not all that experienced with NQC or the RCX generally. I've got a the latest version of NQC, a Cybermaster, an (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
