|
|
 | | Re: Release date for RCX 2.0?
|
| Only for RCX! But you can use NQC. Zhengrong (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: .lx format
|
| (...) We are going to use this solution. Seems simpler. /jakob (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Running IR in the background
|
| (...) Congratulations! Could you post your source code here, to compare with the solution that we previously submitted to an almost identical question? We use an active light sensor reading in one taks, with a different task bangin zeroes using (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: .lx format
|
| (...) We arrived at that solution independently here... it makes more sense. Also, since only the parts of the kernel we actually use need to be linked in, the result should be much smaller than a full kernel. Furthermore, the compiler we are using (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: .lx format
|
| (...) We arrived at that solution independently here... it makes more sense. Also, since only the parts of the kernel we actually use need to be linked in, the result should be much smaller than a full kernel. Furthermore, the compiler we are using (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
