 | | Re: please help with threaded robot program
|
|
(...) Thanks for the pointer. I'll go check it out. (My bad for not actually searching on "subsumption" -- I think I searched for +lejos +thread.) Susan (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: multiple "execi" with different priorities
|
|
(...) of (...) The call looks fine, but as Bernado said, you have to make sure that higher priority tasks relinquish control regularly. IIRC all tasks of a given priority must get a slice before any lower priority tasks get any slice. And remember (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: multiple "execi" with different priorities
|
|
(...) That line seems ok to me. Setting priority for a task above 10 (normal priority) may cause starvation to other tasks. This depend on what your function process() does. If it never waits (using calls like wait_event(), sleep(), sem_wait()...) (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | X Windows front-end for NQC?
|
|
Hi Folks, I have used the RCXCC under windows for quite a while, but now I am quite taken with my shiny new Linux install on my desktop and my Agenda linux PDA. I searched through the archives and found Joel asking about a GUI for NQC, but there (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | multiple "execi" with different priorities
|
|
Hi, I am trying to run three different tasks, with the "execi" command. When all of the have the same priority=10, everything works ok. When I change the priority in one of them priority=11 or 12, then everything seems to go much slower, and (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
