|
|
 | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, May 09, 1999 5:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) SENSOR_READ has changed, I think the sense of the result is different 4000 POWER_GET returns (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 8:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Am I doing something wrong here (my FORTH is a bit rusty)? : .VOLTAGE RCX_POWER [ HEX ] 4001 (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 7:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Actually, I thought that anything running interactively (or I suppose more accurately not (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 10:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Well, I'm not in a position that I really need MARKER with the multitasking testing, just a (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 10:13 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Definately 2 (...) I couldn't see it earlier, but I see now that the voltage in millivolts (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: IR mode
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 6:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: IR mode (...) I wonder if these will work? ;---...--- ; IRMODE_HI ( -- ) M_CODE(9,``"IRMODE_H...HI,_SLINK) MOV.W (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 5:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH MARKER seems to work, but I haven't tested it much as my debug runs more often end up in a lockup, (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: pbFORTH and MARKER
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 1999 7:16 PM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: pbFORTH and MARKER (...) Great news. I don't actually need it yet (or enough). I am stillexperimenting with (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 5:08 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH I have it now, thank you. I've figured out how POWER_GET works, but not the return values. From (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Saturday, May 01, 1999 12:07 PM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Unfortunately my mailer could not decode the MIME attachment. Could you send it UUENCODEd? (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
|
