|
|
 | | Re: global output control
|
| (...) That sounds like a reason to use it right there. :) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: global output control
|
| (...) Yes it is a great description of the actual function, however I feel the word is a bit obscure and that's why I hesitate about using it. That's what the "not sure" is...Obvert technically means the right thing, but perhaps isn't obvious to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Dumb VB question
|
| If using the constants OUTPUT_A, OUTPUT_B, OUTPUT_C instead of "012" ... how can you refer to multiple outputs in one command? "OUTPUT_AOUTPUT_BOUTPUT_C" certainly doesn't work, and neither do "OUTPUT_A,OUTPUT_B,OUTPUT_C" or "OUTPUT_A OUTPUT_B (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: New to legOS, can you get it seperately?
|
| (...) It is free, but it won't do you much good without an RCX- to the best of my knowledge it won't run on anything else. (...) It's not really another type of C- just a different set of libraries. Other than that, same old C. -Luis (...) ---...--- (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| |
|
