 | | LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
Hello, I spent some time working on an ActiveX for LNP communication and I think that may be of interest for some of the users of this group. You can find the sources at (URL) send me all your comments. Thanks, Yannis (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.x event processing
|
|
(...) Not really a stack problem, just a control flow issue. On suggestion for the event handling was something like this: begin_events(EVENT_MASK, event_handler); // put code that executes during event monitoring here end_events event_handler: // (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: using the <remote> commmand in NQC
|
|
(...) Those are documented in the "LASM Byte Codes.pdf" file from the RCX 2 SDK (available at www.legomindstorms.com). I think the LASM command is actually 'remote', but I'm not sure. Dave Baum p.s. In general, if you want to dig into the details of (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Luis Villa <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message news:960488287.393fe...uke.edu... (...) productive, (...) Well, it depends of course on what you intend to do with it. If you for example design and implement a protocol of some sort, it's a great (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | two questions
|
|
Hey, everybody. I have two questions, most of which probably can't be understood by most of the readers on this list :( 1) Is there any way that the stack size might be miscalculated by the new, improved makelx? I've experienced a problem where a (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
