 | | Re: Major breakthrough serial wise.
|
|
(...) I'm confusing everybody by asking questions that imply that I am changing existing code. I do not touch existing code. The question about where to enable the interrupt is a final cleanup one. It is not what I am doing now. I have not touched (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: TinyVM Cygwin Port
|
|
(...) Andy didn't mention that the only version that will probably work under CygWin is 0.1.4. A couple of things were fixed in the tools. Also, by 0.1.5 (hopefully next weekend) I'll try to incorporate Andy's feedback in the scripts, so they will (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Power supply
|
|
(...) The 1.0 can accept a pretty standard DC convereter plug (look in the back). The 1.5 kits don't have this, the 2.0 kits will (supposedly.) I don't use this (which is dumb;) but many others have with good results. -Luis ---...--- "Going to (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: communication brick <-> PC
|
|
(...) Cool. We'll wait patiently. :) (24 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: communication brick <-> PC
|
|
(...) My current thoughts are to add "listen" support to rcxlib/RCX_Link, but not add anything else to the nqc tool itself. This would facilitate writing a small wrapper program around rcxlib/RCX_Link that could send/receive messages without (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
