 | | Re: Compiling NQC
|
|
(...) Of course, I did not mean to imply she is off course. (...) > > (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | IS free()'s operation atomic?
|
|
Hi all I think that free() operation in mm.c is not ISR safe in multitasking mode. This operation is not keep coherence about value of mm_first_free,is it? ---...--- in mm.c ---...--- // for task safe operations, free needs to be // atomic and (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Compiling NQC
|
|
Well what do you know...I install gcc 2.8.0 and still no luck. But a clue lurks in the docs....and since I had none (clues that is) I read on. To compile c++ you must install libstdc 2.8.0. I find it and compile into gcc. Just for luck I grab the (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC 1.3 has been released
|
|
I just posted NQC 1.3 to the main web site: (URL) an excerpt from the readme... version 1.3 ---...--- Calls to inline function may now be made before their definition. abs() and sign() operators added. SetWatch() added to rcx.nqh. Toggle() added to (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Compiling NQC
|
|
I will pull gcc down tonight and try a fresh install...the gcc installation that came with openlinux is what I installed, and I am seeing make problems elsewhere now. Rich Thompson rich_thompson@cmcsmart.com (URL) -----Original Message----- (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
