|
|
 | | RE: Religious wars
|
| XEmacs is great AND despite what everyone thinks, you DO NOT NEED X to run it. It automatically knows whether to do terminal or X. Ram (...) (URL) for text editors. There aren't many out there that aren't X-based, since those people who prefer (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Religious wars
|
| Not emacs? And not X based? Oof. That's a tough one. My suggestions, in order. : 1) Fix your X configuration and run X and Xemacs. What card do you run? I may be able to help, or at least know where to point you. And, Xemacs has nice pull-down menus (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Religious wars
|
| (...) Use emacs. I don't care that you think it sucks ... you asked for religious wars. :-) Cheers, Ben. -- (URL) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Religious wars
|
| I need to pick a Linux editor for legOS programming. emacs and vi suck big time. Anyone have a recommendation? It can not be X windows based as I have not been able to get my video card configured correctly. Under Windows, I prefer using UltraEdit. (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Linux vs. Windows 95
|
| I just installed SuSE Linux 6.3 so that I can do some comparison tests between the different legOS development environments (I told my wife I needed to learn Linux to keep pace with the computer industry, though I don't think she believed me for a (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
