 | | Object recognition
|
|
Hi Does somebody have an experience with simple object recognition ( for example distinguishing between large obstacles and small objects using proximity detector )? I am currently experimenting with proximity detector based on 3 parallel light (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: memcpy patch for gcc 2.95.2 wanted
|
|
(...) Because there were some decisions made as to what "incorrect" macros were and weren't by the egcs/gcc teams. For some time, this made compiling the Linux kernel with the newest egcs a serious problem. (...) Cool. -Luis (...) ###...### (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memcpy patch for gcc 2.95.2 wanted
|
|
Les Smithson <lsmithso@hare.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:Fs0v5B.J44@lugnet.com... (...) You saved me the trouble of posting the exact same fix. Thanks. I'm concerned there might be other problems caused by this bug. Fixing this routine treats (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memcpy patch for gcc 2.95.2 wanted
|
|
(...) I think the compiler was generating incorrect code. I'm no gcc expert, but the asm macros looked OK to me, and besides, why should the macro work in one compiler version & not the other? FYI, I fixed it by compiling the source to an assembler (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.1 r2 released
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: memcpy patch for gcc 2.95.2 wanted
|
|
(...) Sorry... I was going to recommend the same thing last night, but got sidetracked (it has been a tough two days to be a Duke basketball fan.) I have a question: from where in the code is the incorrect assembly generated? i.e., could it be (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: memcpy patch for gcc 2.95.2 wanted
|
|
(...) That was probably me. I don't know anything about GCC asm macros so I wasn't sure if it was a bug in memcpy or a bug in GCC's code generation. I solved the problem by going to egcs-1.1.2 which generates correct code. I was hoping that someone (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | NQC 2.1 r2 released
|
|
A few very minor bug fixes, no new features...probably not worth the download unless you're having problems. (URL) Baum (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc) !
|
| |
| | TinyVM 0.1.2 Released
|
|
A new version of TinyVM (a JVM for the RCX) is now available from: (URL) usual location is (URL) we were experiencing technical difficulties; it should be up by the time you read this). 0.1.2 has several improvements over 0.1.1, including some (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Priority problem...
|
|
Okay. sorry for cluttering the group with this drival... my main task was intefering with task priorities due to a while loop doing nothing at the end... after removing it and letting the main task end.. the task for sensor worked fine with lower (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
